CRISPR-based genome editing of a diurnal rodent, Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus)

Background Diurnal and nocturnal mammals have evolved distinct pathways to optimize survival for their chronotype-specific lifestyles. Conventional rodent models, being nocturnal, may not sufficiently recapitulate the biology of diurnal humans in health and disease. Although diurnal rodents are potentially advantageous for translational research, until recently, they have not been genetically tractable. The present study aims to address this major limitation by developing experimental procedures necessary for genome editing in a well-established diurnal rodent model, the Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus). Results A superovulation protocol was established, which yielded nearly 30 eggs per female grass rat. Fertilized eggs were cultured in a modified rat 1-cell embryo culture medium (mR1ECM), in which grass rat embryos developed from the 1-cell stage into blastocysts. A CRISPR-based approach was then used for gene editing in vivo and in vitro, targeting Retinoic acid-induced 1 (Rai1), the causal gene for Smith-Magenis Syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder. The CRISPR reagents were delivered in vivo by electroporation using an improved Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery (i-GONAD) method. The in vivo approach produced several edited founder grass rats with Rai1 null mutations, which showed stable transmission of the targeted allele to the next generation. CRISPR reagents were also microinjected into 2-cell embryos in vitro. Large deletion of the Rai1 gene was confirmed in 70% of the embryos injected, demonstrating high-efficiency genome editing in vitro. Conclusion We have established a set of methods that enabled the first successful CRISPR-based genome editing in Nile grass rats. The methods developed will guide future genome editing of this and other diurnal rodent species, which will promote greater utility of these models in basic and translational research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-024-01943-9.


Background
Model organisms are essential for biomedical research in understanding physiology and pathology relevant to human health and disease.Commonly used animal models in biomedical research including laboratory mice or rats are nocturnal (night-active), while humans are diurnal (day-active).Diurnal and nocturnal mammals have acquired different adaptations through the evolution of numerous pathways to optimize survival for a day-or night-active lifestyle [1].An internal time-keeping system, namely the circadian clock system, has evolved to predict and prepare animals for the daily fluctuations in their environment.Circadian systems coordinate the temporal organizations of molecular, cellular, and physiological processes across the body to ensure the functions of cells, tissues, and organs are synchronized with the environmental day-night cycle [2].In mammals, this system is organized in a hierarchical manner, with the principal brain clock within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), coordinating the circadian rhythms of subordinate clocks in other brain regions and in peripheral tissues and organs [3].The expression of core clock genes within the SCN shows the same temporal dynamics, i.e., peaking at the same time in diurnal and nocturnal animals; however, other brain regions and peripheral organs show complex differences between the two chronotypes.Large-scale transcriptomic studies revealed that the shared rhythmic genes' peak expression shifted by 6-15 h between nocturnal (mouse) and diurnal (baboon) species depending on tissue types [4,5].Therefore, the circadian system in nocturnal and diurnal species differs in a more complex manner than a simply inverted daily pattern [1], which likely involves distinct wiring of neural circuits and gene-regulatory networks [4][5][6][7].Furthermore, evidence suggests that experimentation during nocturnal rodents' inactive phase can be a major cause of human clinical trial failures of drug candidates proven to be effective in preclinical mouse models [8].For these reasons, diurnal rodents are advantageous over nocturnal ones for translational research [9].A major limitation of diurnal rodents in biomedical research is that they have not been genetically tractable.The present study aimed to overcome this barrier and develop methods for gene editing in a diurnal rodent, the Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus).
Nile grass rats, together with laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus), are members of the family Muridae [10], and these species are likely to have diverged from a common ancestor relatively recently [1].Nile grass rats, like mice, attain reproductive maturity rapidly, have a 24-day gestation period and mate on postpartum estrus, which makes maintenance of a colony relatively simple [11].Nile grass rats are clearly diurnal both in nature and in the laboratory, as indicated by their patterns of activity, sleep, mating behavior, body temperature, and secretion of luteinizing hormones [1].Their retinal anatomy and retinorecipient brain regions are also typical for animals active during the daytime [12][13][14].The Nile grass rat colony at Michigan State University was established in 1993 from a cohort of animals captured from the Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya [15].The colony has been maintained since then, and animals derived from this colony have been shared with numerous research groups that investigate circadian rhythms and sleep, affective behaviors, cognitive function, immune function, metabolic syndromes, ophthalmology, and evolutionary biology.Despite being a well-established diurnal rodent model, Nile grass rats have not been genetically tractable because their complete genome sequence and an established genome editing protocol have not been available.Recently, the Vertebrate Genome Project [16,17] released the initial build of the Nile grass rat genome [18], opening up an opportunity for genome editing in this species.
In the present work, taking advantage of CRISPR-Cas9 and i-GONAD, we developed a method for genome editing of the Nile grass rat.To our knowledge, this study demonstrates genome editing of this well-established diurnal rodent model for the first time.The first targeted gene in this species is the Retinoic acid-induced 1 (Rai1) gene, whose haploinsufficiency is responsible for Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS), a neurodevelopmental disorder [45].We also succeeded in several critical steps essential for gene targeting, including superovulation and embryo culture, which will allow for direct in vitro embryonic manipulation (microinjection and electroporation) of a variety of genome editing reagents beyond CRISPR-Cas9, thereby paving the way for future efforts to equip this diurnal model with a variety of molecular and genetic tools currently available for conventional laboratory mice or rats.

Superovulation of Nile grass rats
In order to produce a high number of fertilized grass rat embryos for genome editing, we attempted to establish a superovulation protocol by varying the timing of hormone treatment and egg collection as outlined below.The egg yield and fertilization rate were then compared to those from a natural mating cohort.

Timing of hormone treatment and egg collection
Due to the lack of knowledge about the reproductive biology of this species, we designed superovulation protocols based on observations from grass rat breeding and standard superovulation protocols in mouse and rat.Our colony breeding records showed that a notable number of first litters were born between 26 and 30 days after males and females were paired, indicating that day 3 and day 4 post pairing is likely the early receptive mating window.Therefore, superovulation protocols were set to administer the hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on day 3 or 4 after priming using pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin (PMSG).Embryo yields from females that underwent superovulation with PMSG and hCG were compared to those from unassisted natural mating.All animals were housed in daily 12:12 h light/dark cycle, with lights on at 6:00 am.Collectively 6 out of 8 groups (Table 1, group # 3-8) of superovulated females produced 20 eggs per female on average (mean ± SEM: 20.8 ± 2.2), significantly higher than the number of eggs (5 ± 0.9) produced by natural mating (t-test, t 31 = 4.88, p < 0.001).In those 6 groups (#3-8), PMSG was administered between 6:00 am and 11:00 am (day 1), hCG was administered 48 to 57 h later between 2:00 pm and 4:00 pm (day 3), and eggs were collected on day 4 at 9:00 am or 5:00 pm (19 to 27 h post-hCG, group #4, 5, 8) to time the embryo development at pronuclear stage, or day 5 at 9:00 am, 10:00 am, or 2:00 pm (40 to 51 h post-hCG, group #3, 6, 7) with the aim to obtain 2-cell staged embryos.A shorter PMSG-hCG interval (36 to 48 h) and an earlier egg collection (on day 3) was tested in groups #1 and #2 which resulted in a lower yield of eggs (4.6 ± 1.1), comparable to that from the natural mating group (t-test, t 18 = 0.32, p = 0.75).While the dosage of PMSG and hCG was kept constant (15 IU  1).In summary, superovulation of grass rat females can be achieved, and the current protocol is sufficient to produce a large number of oocytes.

Fertilization rate
Although the number of eggs produced in the hormone-treated groups was significantly higher than in the natural mating group, the rate of females that underwent copulation was unexpectedly low.Only 7 out of the 22 females were sperm positive in the superovulation group, while 11 out of 17 females in the natural mating group were sperm positive as determined by a vaginal plug or smear (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).Thus, the fertilization rate in the hormone-treated groups was significantly lower than in the natural mating group (37 ± 15.2% vs 89.5 ± 5.8%; t-test, t 14 = 3.83, p < 0.01).These results indicate that further optimization is required to outperform the natural mating procedure in producing zygotes or embryos for in vitro genome editing manipulation.

Male presence during superovulation
To facilitate the receptivity of females after superovulation, males were introduced into female cages right after PMSG injection in some groups (#6, 7, 8), to allow females to become familiarized with the males.However, the timing of pairing during superovulation seemed to have no significant effect on the number of total or fertilized eggs between groups (t-test, t 20 = 0.9, p = 0.38).

Early development and in vitro culture of Nile grass rat embryos
To understand the time course of early embryo development and to determine permissive conditions and timing for embryo microinjection, eggs collected from three cohorts of superovulated females were cultured in vitro.
None of the eggs collected from group #4 (19 h post-hCG, Table 1) showed signs of fertilization at the time of harvesting; after 8 h of culture in M2 medium, several zygotes developed pronuclei, but did not develop further (Additional file 2: Fig. S2).
Previous studies have reported that in suboptimal culture conditions, early embryo development of mouse, hamster, and rat, arrests at the 1-or 2-cell stage, referred to as the "2-cell block" [46][47][48][49], which could be overcome with different concentrations of nutrients and culture media [50][51][52][53].To bypass a potential 2-cell block in this species, 2-cell stage embryos (n = 11) collected on day 5 (52 h post-hCG, group #3, Table 1) were cultured in M2 medium on a 37 °C heat stage, in air for 5 h.These culture conditions supported some embryos reaching the 4-cell stage.The embryos were then transferred either into Sydney IVF Fertilization Medium (SIFM) mouse embryo culture medium or modified rat 1-cell embryo culture medium (mR1ECM) with PVA, while a few were left in M2 medium.After 2 to 3 days of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 , blastocysts were observed in both SIFM and mR1ECM media, but not in M2 medium (Fig. 1).Out of 5 embryos from each group, 4 developed into blastocysts in mR1ECM, while only 1 developed into blastocyst in Fig. 1 Comparison of two standard mouse and rat embryo media for grass rat embryos in vitro culture.Nile grass rat 2-cell stage embryos were flushed on the morning of day 5, 52 h post hCG injection from oviducts of sperm-positive females.Embryos were washed in M2 medium and then cultured in mouse embryo culture medium SIFM, mouse embryo handling medium M2, or rat embryo culture medium mR1ECM-PVA.During in vitro culture, embryos were cultured in 20 µL medium micro-drops under mineral oil, in a 5% CO 2 incubator at 37 °C SIFM; moreover, blastocysts appeared to be bigger with more cells in mR1ECM medium.
We further tested mR1ECM medium on 1-cell stage embryos to determine if a 2-cell block occurred.At the time of embryo collection from group #5 (27 h post-hCG, Table 1), 4 out of 13 embryos appeared to have pronuclei; then, embryos were divided into 2 groups and cultured in mR1ECM media supplemented either with PVA or BSA.After 21 h of culture, or 48 h post-hCG, 5 out of 6 embryos in mR1ECM-PVA and 5 out of 7 in mR1ECM-BSA reached the 2-cell stage.Blastocysts started to appear at 96 h post-hCG first in mR1ECM-BSA, and subsequently in mR1ECM-PVA (Fig. 2).Together, these results demonstrate that mR1ECM media can support grass rat embryos to develop into blastocysts from the 1-cell stage in vitro and bypass a potential 2-cell block.The number of pronuclei, 4 out of 13 at 27 h post-hCG, and the number of 2 cells, 10 out of 13 at 48 h post-hCG, collectively indicated that most of the pronuclei developed 27-h post-hCG, which would coincide with the night on day 4 post-pairing.In natural mating experiments, embryos were observed at pronuclear stage when they were harvest at midnight on the day of mating, then turning into 2-cell embryos in the next morning.This finding suggests that the ideal time window for manipulating grass rat embryos at the pronuclei stage is likely around midnight on mating day.However, to avoid disturbing the animals in the middle of their inactive/sleep phase, in subsequent in vitro experiment, microinjection was performed in next morning into 2-cell embryos.

Rai1 gRNA validation and generation of Rai1 KO Nile grass rat via i-GONAD
Gurumurthy et al. developed GONAD and improved-GONAD (i-GONAD), in which CRISPR components are injected into the oviduct harboring fertilized eggs followed by electroporation allowing the delivery of CRISPR reagents into zygotes.i-GONAD does not require either embryo manipulation in vitro, or surrogate pseudopregnant females [39,40].The lack of established methods for production of pseudopregnant grass rat surrogates, pointed to i-GONAD as a viable approach to generate genome-edited Nile grass rats.
The gene we targeted was Rai1, encoding a histonebinding protein.Rai1 haploinsufficiency is responsible for Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by obesity, autistic behavior, and circadian rhythm and sleep disturbances [45,54].Although the obesity and some behavioral traits have been recapitulated in Rai1-knockout mice, Rai1 +/− mice "clearly differ from SMS patients" regarding their sleep and circadian rhythms [55].Contrary to the daytime sleepiness seen in SMS patients, the total timespent-awake in Rai1 +/− mice was comparable to wild type (WT) during their active phase.On the other hand, SMS patients also experience frequent night awakening, while Rai1 +/− mice slept significantly more than WT during their resting phase.These observations raise a possibility that the inverted chronotype contributes to the lack of sleep phenotypes in the SMS mouse model.Thus, Rai1 is an ideal gene to test the utility of Nile grass rats for human disease modeling.
Two guide RNAs (gRNAs), g169 and g170, were designed to delete 2035 bp of exon3, encoding most of the Rai1 protein (Fig. 3A).In vivo targeting efficiency of the gRNAs was validated in a female from natural mating that underwent i-GONAD.Within an hour following the i-GONAD procedure, three zygotes were retrieved from the oviduct and cultured in an incubator to the morula/ blastocyst stage.After 4 days of culture in mR1ECM-PVA Fig. 2 Nile grass rat embryos in vitro culture from 1-cell stage.Grass rat eggs were flushed on the afternoon of day 4, 27 h post hCG injection from oviducts of sperm positive females.Eggs or zygotes were washed and then cultured in mR1ECM with PVA or with BSA, in a 5% CO 2 incubator at 37 °C until harvest medium, embryos were collected and lysed individually for analysis by PCR amplifying both long-range and short-range amplicons of the target sites for g169 and g170.PCR analysis revealed that 1 out of the 3 embryos carried a large deletion between the cut sites of the two gRNAs (Fig. 3B, C).Subsequent sequencing data revealed that the embryo also carried an allele with indels at the cut sites of both g169 and g170, while another embryo carried a 6 bp mutation around g169 (Fig. 3D & E), indicating that 2 out of 3 embryos were successfully edited.
Once the editing efficiency of the g169 and g170 was confirmed, multiple cohorts of female grass rats, either superovulated with PMSG/hCG or following natural mating, underwent i-GONAD in attempts to generate Rai1 knockout (KO) grass rats (Table 2).For the hormonetreated animals, PMSG was administered on day 1 at 6 am, hCG on day 3 at 2:00 pm, and i-GONAD was performed on day 4 at ~ 5:00 pm following the confirmation of successful mating in the morning.For natural mating pairs, a vaginal smear was checked to confirm sperm presence in the morning of day 4 to day 5 post-pairing, and i-GONAD was performed in the afternoon.
Initially, females were singly housed after i-GONAD, but neither the PMGS/hCG primed (n = 10) nor those from natural mating pairs (n = 8) gave birth to any live pups (Table 2, group #1 & #2).Since previous studies of hamsters and voles have suggested that male proximity contributes to pregnancy success [56][57][58][59], in subsequent cohorts, the male was not removed from the cage after the i-GONAD procedure and was co-housed with the female for at least 10 days to facilitate pregnancy maintenance.In the cohort of hormone-treated females (Table 2, group #3), 2 out of 13 were sperm positive as detected by vaginal smear and underwent i-GONAD.One of them produced a litter of 5 offspring.Although the litter died a few days postnatally, one of the pups was From the first several litters, only 2 live pups out of 43 born carried Rai1 large deletions (Fig. 4A).Subsequently, four females underwent i-GONAD and produced 2 litters of 9 pups in total (Table 2, group #6), of which 4 pups carried multiple large deletions (Fig. 4B).Sanger sequencing revealed various deletions across litters (Fig. 4B).The deletion events appeared to occur mostly heterozygously or exhibit mosaicism, except for animals iG5-iG8, which did not show WT bands (Fig. 4A, B).We reasoned that the absence of WT band may be due to inefficient  PCR amplification of the larger WT amplicon, because another primer set amplifying smaller WT amplicon provided signal from animals iG6 and iG7 (Fig. 4C lower panel).In sum, analysis of founder (G0) offspring revealed successfully edited Rai1 KO animals following i-GONAD delivery of CRISPR reagents.
After breeding with WT animals, Rai1 KO founders iG6 and iG7 successfully transmitted the edited Rai1 allele to their G1 offspring (Fig. 4C).Founder iG6 transmitted 2 in-frame deletions to G1: a 2190-bp deletion removing amino acids G9-P738 (Fig. 4D), and a 741-bp deletion of amino acids E466-P712.In a subsequent litter from iG6, a frameshift deletion of 962 bp was also transmitted to G1 (Additional file 3: Fig. S3).Founder iG7 transmitted 2 frameshift deletions, 874 bp (Fig. 4E) and 665 bp were detected in G1 animals iG7-1B and iG7-1C (Fig. 4F).Multiple bands were detected in individual founders, indicative of mosaicism-the presence of multiple alleles in the same animal, whereas only single altered DNA species were detected in G1 animals (Fig. 4C, D).These results demonstrate successful gene targeting of Rai1 in Nile grass rats and stable transmission of the targeted allele to the next generation.

In vitro Nile grass rat embryo microinjection
i-GONAD is suitable for delivery of CRISPR RNPs, mRNA, gRNA, and single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN).However, the delivery of large DNA molecules harboring transgenes requires microinjection directly into the zygote despite emerging reports about introducing large DNAs in vivo by adeno-associated virus (AAV) [60,61].Thus, delivering genetic material via microinjection is a key step towards sophisticated genetic manipulations such as conditional gene targeting.To avoid disturbing animals at midnight when embryos are at pronuclear stage, we tested microinjection of Rai1 CRISPR reagents into 2-cell embryos during daytime.
Seven 2-cell and three 4-cell stage embryos were collected on day 5 following natural mating.HEPES buffered mR1ECM-BSA medium was used for embryo collection and microinjection of ribonucleoprotein (RNP), while mR1ECM-PVA was used for embryo culture postmicroinjection.During the microinjection process, none of the embryos showed any sign of cytotoxicity or morphological changes.Following 3 days of culture in mR1ECM-PVA medium, 9 out of 10 embryos developed into 5 blastocysts and 4 morulae.PCR and sequencing of the amplicon spanning the region between the two Rai1 gRNAs revealed that 7 out of 9 embryos carried large deletions of the Rai1 gene (Fig. 5).Therefore, CRISPR RNP microinjection into grass rat embryos can result in high-efficiency genome editing in vitro.

Discussion
CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing is not only used routinely in creating standard laboratory rodent models like mice and rats, but has also been used in engineering of non-conventional rodent models, including prairie voles [62,63] and hamsters [64,65], as well as livestock [30,31,34,66].However, genome editing has faced some unique challenges in diurnal rodents.Previous attempts to generate a germline transgenic line using a closely related diurnal rodent, the Sudanian grass rat (Arvicanthis ansorgei), reported repeated failures, likely due to "the lack of knowledge of experimental procedures suitable for creating transgenic diurnal rodents" [67].The present study serves as the first step toward developing the diurnal Nile grass rat as a genetically tractable model for translational research.Through this effort, we have achieved a few major milestones, from establishing conditions for superovulation, fertilization, embryo culture, and manipulation, to successfully producing founder animals carrying targeted deletions that were then transmitted to G1 offspring.An effective protocol to generate enough embryos is critical for successful genome editing.Extensive reproductive biology research has established superovulation, in vitro culture, and in vivo fertilization protocols in rodent species including mice, rats, hamsters [68], and prairie voles [69], laying the foundation for successful genome editing in those species, but such reproductive and early embryo development studies are lacking for the Nile grass rat or other diurnal rodents.The results from the current study contribute a working protocol that can effectively produce a large number of eggs in grass rats.Although the rate of females showing signs of successful mating was lower in the superovulated group than in the natural mating group, the ability to produce more eggs will be useful for in vitro fertilization approaches which are advantageous for reducing the number of egg donors to be euthanized while obtaining large number of embryos [70,71].Thus, this technique could be used to assist future genome editing in grass rats or other diurnal rodents.
Conditions that support early embryo development in vitro enable embryo manipulation required for delivery of genome editing reagents such as microinjection and electroporation as well as the study of early embryogenesis.Through our superovulation studies, we were able to get a glimpse of the early embryo development timeline in the grass rats.Currently, there are no reports of in vitro handling of grass rat embryos or the timing and staging of early grass rat development.Based on the stage of embryos collected at different intervals from 19 to 52 h post hCG injection, the time course of the early grass rat development could be mapped out as follows: fertilization completes < 19 h; pronuclei form ≥ 27 h; then 2 cells form > 40 h.We found that both M2 and mR1ECM-HEPES could be used as shortterm embryo handling medium, while mR1ECM-PVA and mR1ECM-BSA both support grass rat embryos to develop from the pronuclear to blastocyst stage in culture in vitro.These results suggest that media optimized for rats might be suitable for the Nile grass rat for further studies such as in vitro fertilization or embryo or sperm cryopreservation.
Understanding the timeline of natural mating, from breeding pair setup, vaginal plug and sperm detection to embryo harvesting and early embryo development, ultimately enabled us to perform genome editing in this species without superovulation.Furthermore, our initial attempts of i-GONAD with 18 females, which failed to produce any pups, led us to discover another unique feature for the reproductive success in this species-the requirement of male presence in order to carry pregnancies to term.While it is standard practice to single house mice or rats following embryo implantation or i-GONAD procedures, male proximity appears to be critical for successful pregnancy in grass rats.Similarly, it has been reported that for prairie voles continued male presence facilitates pregnancy maintenance [72].Hence, the final piece of the puzzle was in place for targeting grass rats with the outcome of 5 founders surviving to adulthood.Two of the Rai1 knockout founders transmitted their deletion to G1 offspring after backcrossing with wild-type animals, demonstrating that the targeted alleles could be established as stable genomeedited grass rat lines for future functional studies.
To facilitate future genome targeting in this species, we propose a scheme for Nile grass rat genome targeting, either through natural mating or via superovulation (Fig. 6).Briefly, if the day of pairing females with males Fig. 6 A proposed scheme for Nile grass rat genome targeting.Females ranging from 3 to 11 months old can be used as egg donors or embryo transfer recipients, while proven breeder males are needed for mating.Procedure for natural mating: (1) The day that males are paired with females is defined as day 1 (D1).( 2) Vaginal smear cytology is assessed in the late afternoon of day 4 (D4) to determine if i-GONAD could be performed.At that timepoint, zygotes were found to be either at or prior to the early pronuclear stage, so in vitro manipulation on the afternoon of day 4 is not recommended.(3) Vaginal smear cytology is assessed on the morning of day 5 (D5), to determine if embryo manipulation can be performed on that day, including i-GONAD, in vitro embryo electroporation, or microinjection followed by embryo transfer into surrogate females, or embryo culture in vitro for gRNA validation.(4) Females are co-housed with males at least until day 10 (D10).( 5) Females are monitored for signs of labor starting from day 26 through day 30.( 6) Any pups born are genotyped upon weaning in natural mating, or the day of PMSG administration is defined as day 1 (D1), females with a sperm positive vaginal smear on day 4 (D4) will be suitable for embryo targeting on day 5 (D5).Late evening of D4 or daytime of D5 is the embryo manipulation window for pronuclear or 2-cell staged embryos.Co-housing a female that underwent targeting with a male until at least day 10 (D10) is critical for the maintenance of a successful pregnancy.It should be noted that in the present study, the i-GONAD method was used for generating KO grass rats, CRISPR-mediated knock-in (KI) via i-GONAD has not been tested in grass rats.DNA template delivery is a critical step for generating KIs.While it is possible to deliver short DNA template via i-GONAD, longer DNA template required for larger KI will likely need be delivered by other approaches, such as microinjection or AAV-mediated DNA delivery.The present work has identified the developmental time window from pronuclear to 2-cell staged embryos in grass rats.If G2 phase is longer in 2-cell stage embryos than in 1-cell embryo stage in grass rat, as in mice, 2-cell microinjection will be suitable for KI targeting in this species.The high editing efficiency of microinjected of 2-cell embryos with Rai1 RNPs is encouraging in that this method could be used to generate KI Nile grass rats in our future work.

Conclusions
In the present study, fundamental steps were taken towards creating genome edited diurnal rodent models.The newly created Rai1 KO Nile grass rat line using i-GONAD is a unique model for understanding the role of Rai1 in the neurodevelopmental disorder SMS.More importantly, the high targeting rate of 2-cell embryo microinjection demonstrated its potential for other forms of gene editing, including the generation of point mutations, knocking in epitope tags and larger insertions, and creating conditional alleles with the Cre-loxP system.We hope this method will help guide future development of genetically modified grass rats and other diurnal rodents, which will promote greater utility of these models in basic and translational research.

Animals
Adult male and female Nile grass rats were obtained from an in-house laboratory colony at Michigan State University [15].The colony was maintained in standard animal housing room under a 12:12 h light/dark (LD) cycle, with lights on at 6:00 and lights off at 18:00.A metal hut was provided in each cage for shelter and enrichment.Food (Prolab 2000 #5P06, PMI Nutrition LLC, MO, USA) and water were available ad libitum.All procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 80-23) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan State University.

Superovulation and natural mating
As a species of induced ovulators, female grass rats only start the ovulatory cycle after being co-housed with a male.Animals reach reproductive maturity around 2 months of age and can reproduce up to 16 months of age based on our observation of colony animals.Young to middle-aged adults (3-to 7-month-old) were used in this experiment based on the availability of animals in the colony.For superovulation experiments, singly housed females were first injected with PMSG (15 IU or 20 IU, BioVendor) in the morning (time of injection and dosage are listed in Table 2), followed by hCG (CHORULON ® , MERCK) at various intervals ranging from 36 to 57 h, at the same dosage as PMSG.A male was introduced to each hormone-treated female to allow mating, either following hCG administration or immediately after injection of PMSG.
For natural mating, females were paired with males at the ratio of 1:1.In the initial experiments, a vaginal smear from each female under mating was checked daily, until a plug or sperm was found.In later experiments, vaginal smear and sperm presence were checked from day 4 to day 5 post pairing.

Embryo collection and culture
Females that had successfully mated, as confirmed by a vaginal plug or sperm positive smear, were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (i.p. 150 mg/kg).Bilateral oviducts were dissected out and placed in HEPES-buffered embryo culture medium either 27-or 56-h post hCG injection.Embryos were released either by tearing the ampulla at the day of plug, or oviduct flushing the next day after plug or presence of sperm.After washing in HEPES-buffered M2 medium (Sigma) or mR1ECM-BSA (CytoSpring LLC), embryos were cultured in either M2 medium (Sigma), mouse embryo culture medium SIFM (COOK Medical), or rat embryo culture media mR1ECM supplemented with PVA or BSA (CytoSpring LLC).

In vivo genome editing using i-GONAD
The i-GONAD procedure was performed as described previously [41].Briefly, in the afternoon at the day of plug or sperm found, females were placed under isoflurane anesthesia, oviducts were exposed as in a standard embryo transfer procedure, after the RNP mixture was delivered into oviducts with a glass pipette, 4 pulses of 50 V were delivered using a pair of disk electrodes connected to the electroporator, Genome Editor (BEX CO., LTD).After i-GONAD surgeries were completed, females were placed back into their home cage, with or without a male, and were monitored daily.

In vitro genome editing
Genome editing was conducted in vitro via microinjection.RNPs were diluted with 10 mM Tris pH 7.5 buffer to a final concentration of 50 ng/µL each RNP.Embryo donor females were euthanized the next morning after vaginal sperm presence was confirmed.Embryos were collected and placed in HEPES-buffered mR1ECM-BSA culture medium, 2-cell nuclear microinjection was performed using CELLectro (a gift from Dr. Leyi Li, Cold Spring Harbor Lab), as previously described [73,74].Microinjected embryos were cultured in an incubator (5% CO 2 ; 37 °C), until later stages.Morulae or blastocysts were collected and genotyped individually to confirm CRISPR editing efficiency in vitro using PCR.

PCR genotyping
A small number of targeted embryos were genotyped to evaluate the editing efficiency of gRNAs.Briefly, embryos cultured in vitro were harvested when they were at blastocyst or morula stage, after 4 days in culture.Each embryo was placed individually into a PCR tube containing 10 µL of tail lysis buffer (0.1 mg/mL Proteinase K in 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris pH8.5).Before they could be used as genomic DNA templates in PCR reaction, the embryo lysis would go through two steps: digestion at 56 °C for at least 1 h and heat treatment at 85 °C for 15 min.
Pups born from females that went through i-GONAD or embryo transfer were genotyped using standard procedures.In brief, small ear biopsies were lysed at 56 °C overnight for PCR using tail lysis buffer described above, then heat treated at 85 °C for 15 min.Sanger sequencing (Azenta Us Inc., and Quintara Biosciences) was performed on purified PCR amplicon DNA.Primers used for sequencing and genotyping are listed in Table 3.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Targeting of Rai1 in the Nile grass rat.A A locus map denoting the location of gRNA cutting sites (dashed lines, PAM -underlined), primers (black arrows) relative to exons of the Nile grass rat Rai1 gene.The locations of two predicted protein-interacting domains: a nucleosome-binding domain (NBD) and an extended plant homeo-domain (ePHD) are mapped to the corresponding coding region.B PCR of the 2 target regions for blastocysts that underwent i-GONAD: no obvious difference between targeted sample and wild-type.C Long-range PCR spanning both target regions demonstrates that 1 out of 3 blastocysts carries a large deletion.D, E Alignments with reference genome demonstrate the presence of indel mutations around g169 and g170 target sites, not detectable by molecular weight differences in PCRs shown in B

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Generation of Rai1-edited Nile grass rat founders and G1 offspring via i-GONAD.A Gel image of long-range PCRs of 13 pups (P1-P13) from the first 4 i-GONAD litters.Founder P12 (iG1) carries a large deletion.B Gel image of long-range PCRs from a representative litter (pups P36-P42), which produced 4 large deletions out of 7 pups.C PCRs demonstrating that multiple deletions from 2 founders, iG6 and iG7 were transmitted to G1 offspring.D Sanger sequencing chromatogram of G1 animal iG6-1C from founder iG6 shows a 2190-bp deletion.E Sanger sequencing chromatogram of iG7-1B, one of the G1 offspring from founder iG7 shows transmission of a 874-bp deletion.F Summary of transmitted deletion alleles from founders iG6 and iG7.*This G1 animal was from a second litter of founder iG6 shown in Additional file 3: Fig. S3

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Targeting efficiency of Rai1 gRNAs by 2-cell microinjection of in vitro cultured embryos.Gel image showing that 7 out of 9 embryos carry deletions with bands at lower molecular weights than WT

Table 1
Egg and embryo yields from superovulated and natural mating females PMSG/hCG were administered at 15 IU in all superovulation groups except group #6, which received 20 IU a Fertilization rates were determined as the number of fertilized eggs divided by the total number of eggs from sperm positive females for each group of

Table 2
Outcome of Nile grass rat targeting and litters following i-GONAD

Table 3
Primers for Rai1 genotyping